Date: 2010-09-16 09:19 pm (UTC)
The absence of women is my biggest problem with it as well. Sarah had some promising moments but generally just faded into the background as 'generic love interest' and beyond that there was really nothing. I was especially annoyed by the bitchy female detective who served only to be a bitch and for Sherlock to make an ~hilarious~ joke about her giving the jerky policeman a blow job. Colour me unimpressed.

Omg Lestrade as a woman would have been brilliant. Why did they not think of that?! *sigh* It is a problem, I think, that was almost sadly to be expected when you have a show based on a Victorian text that is pretty of its time with the casual sexism/ignoring of women, written by men (awesome men who are often very good writers, but still suffering from the all-too-typical problem of forgetting the existence of women in the universe) who are crazy fanboys of the text and so just never think of developing those oh, what do you call them...oh yeah, female characters.

Hopefully it will improve next year though. Generally I was impressed with the writing and the modernisation and the first episode especially was excellent. They did just have a lot of issues with casual sexism, racism and homophobia via stereotype. Which is tragic.

Anyway, will stop wittering now!
xxx
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

frith_in_thorns: (Default)
Frith

September 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
29 30     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 06:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios